Security guards play a crucial role in ensuring the safety of people and property. Whether they work in shopping malls, office buildings, residential complexes, or event venues, their job is to deter crime, monitor for suspicious activity, and respond to emergencies.

But what happens when a security guard fails in their duty? Can they be held legally accountable if their negligence leads to harm? In Maryland, the answers to these will depend on the specifics of the case, including the guard’s actions, their employer’s role, and the nature of the harm caused.

When you enter a store, you expect it to be safe. You might not like what the store is selling, but you shouldn’t be harmed when shopping.

The same holds true if you go into a restaurant, bar, nightclub, or any other public gathering space. The property owner is responsible for creating a safe environment for their customers.

United States Census Bureau data shows that 31.8% of Maryland residents are renters. There are many benefits to renting an apartment, such as having a fixed monthly rent with no property taxes and having property repairs handled by the landlord or property management company.

What you may not realize, though, is that among their many responsibilities, your landlord also has a “duty of care” to keep you, your fellow residents, and invited guests reasonably safe. If a criminal incident causes you to suffer serious injuries or property loss, can you hold that landlord liable? Technically, you can, but proving such cases can be quite challenging. Continue reading, where we’ll discuss how to sue an apartment complex for negligent security if you opt to pursue this option.

When entering a Maryland place of business, whether as an employee or a customer, there are many things you may be thinking about, but your personal safety should not be one of them. Businesses have a responsibility and a duty of care to provide a safe environment free of potential accidents or acts of physical harm.

In today’s fast-paced world, businesses are constantly facing threats from various sources, including physical incidents. In 2022 alone, situations like these reportedly cost companies an estimated $1 trillion in revenue.

The pain and suffering experienced by someone after being injured can have a serious, even life-long impact on the victim’s life.

In the context of personal injury cases, understanding the legal standards for pain and suffering, especially when due to negligence or intentional wrongdoing, is crucial. It not only helps you determine if you qualify for compensation but also provides guidance on how to pursue that compensation effectively.

In the 1830s and 1840s, negligence law in the United States was just getting started, and the whole idea behind it was pretty simple: If you’re careless and you harm someone, you should be held responsible for it.

As time went on, the key elements of negligence in law became more clearly defined. Most folks agreed on four main parts: duty, breach, cause, and damage, as laid down in the original Restatement of Torts from 1934.

In its latest version, the Third Restatement of Torts (2010/2012), it added one more essential element to the list: Proximate Cause. Whether it’s four elements or five, legal negligence is all about holding people accountable for causing harm through carelessness.

Security guard negligence cases are more common than one might think, and understanding the prevalence of such cases is crucial in recognizing the impact they have on victims. Negligence on the part of security guards can lead to severe consequences, including physical harm, property damage, and emotional distress.

This post will discuss some of the legal responsibilities of a security guard, what constitutes negligence, how common these cases are, and what you can do if you’ve suffered due to security guard negligence.

As a hotel guest, you put your trust in the property owner, whether you realize it or not. You trust that no one can enter your room while you’re sleeping. You trust that you won’t be ambushed while walking to your car. You trust that giving your credit card to the front desk employee is a secure procedure.

In fact, you put more than just your trust in a property owner. When you stay at a hotel, you put your very life in the hands of the party responsible for securing the premises from the actions of criminals.

So what happens if your trust is misplaced? What if someone does enter your room while you’re sleeping, ambush you in the parking lot, or pull a gun in the hotel lobby?

Are you wondering: How do I file a civil lawsuit for negligent security at a hotel? Belsky & Horowitz, LLC can guide you through this complicated legal process. Please contact our office to discuss your case with a member of our team. There is no cost or obligation to learn your legal options.

You may visit several places in or around Baltimore that have security guards, from banks to grocery stores, shopping centers or malls, hospitals and schools, government buildings, apartment complexes, and more. The presence of a security guard gives most individuals who work or visit those places of business a sense that they’re safe; however, that’s not always the case.

While some security guards are armed, others are not. Even if they are, they may not be in the right place at the right time or well-trained enough to de-escalate a situation before damage is done. There’s then a situation where a security guard may be aware of their responsibilities but not carry them out.

It may be possible to hold a security guard or the entity that hired them liable in scenarios like the ones described above. We’ll delve deeper into your options when you get hurt due to a security guard’s negligence below.

When someone owns a property in Maryland, the law requires them to keep those premises safe for people who live and visit. That includes things like maintaining walking areas and keeping the premises safe from fall hazards. But it also means protecting against foreseeable crime.

So what is negligent security? Negligent security means that a crime could have been prevented (or at least made less likely) if adequate security measures had been in place. It means there was a failure to prevent foreseeable criminal conduct from happening on the property.